<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Smartalyx Computer Musings &#187; Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.smartalyx.com/tag/microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.smartalyx.com</link>
	<description>General musings and thoughts from Smartalyx Computer support</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:25:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Apple: More Secure?</title>
		<link>http://blog.smartalyx.com/2008/12/apple-more-secure/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.smartalyx.com/2008/12/apple-more-secure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smartalyx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.smartalyx.com/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the ongoing debates in the computer world is the security of Windows vs Apple. Now I am not going to rehash the whole thing and or jump on a side, right now. I just noticed in Twitter that a very respected individual posted:
 &#8220;Despite Apple&#8217;s off again on again advisories, I still don&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the ongoing debates in the computer world is the security of Windows vs Apple. Now I am not going to rehash the whole thing and or jump on a side, right now. I just noticed in Twitter that a very respected individual posted:<br />
 <strong>&#8220;Despite Apple&#8217;s off again on again advisories, I still don&#8217;t use AV on any of my Macs. Just don&#8217;t run as admin and use a firewall.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>And this got me to thinking that is really the problem. Apple marketing, as cute as it is, made a mockery of the Vista UAC prompt. Basically, this was an attempt by Microsoft to protect people from themselves. Unfortunately, it could get in the way with too many prompts. But a that isn&#8217;t my point. My point is this- if you do not run as administrator in Windows a lot of problems go away as well.</p>
<p>So Windows can be secure out of the box, except Microsoft never really enforced this issue <em>until </em>  Vista. Now what happened- all the application and hardware developers got all up in arms. &#8220;you took away our ability to program&#8221; or &#8220;Our hardware doesn&#8217;t expect to be restricted&#8221; et. al. However the same issues arise in the Mac OS- if I try to install something it will ask me for the correct credentials. So why does Apple continue to get a pass on this? Or more correctly, when Microsoft tried to institute the same thing, why were they demonized?</p>
<p>I heard again today that businesses are avoiding Vista. But I propose it isn&#8217;t 100 percent Microsoft&#8217;s fault. I lay some of the blame on hardware and application developers who refused or resisted teh changes. And Apple is in a much better position to enforce their will- regardless of anything else they still have a small market to concern themselves with. There is no way Microsoft can account for every user situation nor would they be given a pass if they tried to just say &#8220;You are outta luck..&#8221;. Microsoft is the big evil and it is just too easy to continue to bash them.</p>
<p>Please add your thoughts and let me know your take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.smartalyx.com/2008/12/apple-more-secure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
